Shaikh Al-Albaanee
(rahimahullaah)
Question: What are the books you recommend a young person that is starting out in his Islaamic
studies to read?
Answer: If he is a novice, then from the books of Fiqh, we advise him to read "Fiqh As-Sunnah" of
Sayyid Saabiq, while seeking assistance from some of its references, such as "Subul-us-Salaam" (of
Imaam As-Sana'aanee, rahimahullaah). And if he looks into "Tamaam-ul-Mannah" (of Al-Albaanee)
then that will be stronger for him. And I advise him to read "Ar-Rawdat-un-Nadiyyah" (of Sideeq
Hasan Khaan).
As for the subject of Tafseer, then he should habitually read from the book "Tafseer Al-Qur'aan-ul-
'Adheem" of Ibn Katheer – even though it is somewhat long – for it is the most authentic from the
books of Tafseer today.
Then, on the subject of religious exhortation and heart-softening narrations, he should read the book
"Riyaad-us-Saaliheen" of Imaam An-Nawawee.
Then, with regard to the books related to Creed, I advise him to read the book "Sharh Al-'Aqeedat-ut-
Tahaawiyyah" of Ibn Abee Al-'Izz Al-Hanafee. And he should seek assistance, also, from my
comments and explanations to it.
Then, he should make it his customary practice to study from the books of Shaikh-ul-Islaam Ibn
Taimiyyah and his student Ibn Qayyim Al-Jawziyyah, may Allaah have mercy on them. For I hold
them to be from the rare and unique Muslim scholars that have treaded upon the methodology of the
Salaf As-Saalih (righteous predecessors) in their understanding, while having Taqwaa and
righteousness. And we do not purify anyone over Allaah. [Al-Asaalah, Issue #5]
Question: What are the foundations by which the Islaamic world of today can be set anew?
Answer: I believe that what has been reported in the authentic hadeeth provides an explicit answer for
this sort of question and its likes, which have become manifest in this present era. And it is his,
sallAllaahu 'alayhi wa sallam, saying: ”When you involve yourselves in interest bearing (business)
transactions, and you hold on to the tails of cows, and you are pleased with agriculture (i.e. the
land) and you abandon making Jihaad in the Way of Allaah, Allaah will send humiliation down
upon you. And He will not remove it from you until you return back to your Religion.” 15 Thus,
the principal foundation is returning back to Islaam.
This matter has also been indicated by Imaam Maalik (rahimahullaah) in a reported saying of his that
ought to be recorded in golden ink. And it is his saying: "Whosoever introduces into Islaam an
innovation, which he deems is good, then he has claimed that Muhammad, sallAllaahu 'alayhi wa
sallam, has betrayed (the trust of conveying) the Message. Read the saying of Allaah, the Mighty and
Majestic:
15 See Silsilat-ul-Ahaadeeth As-Saheehah (no. 11)
Fataawaa of Shaikh Al-Albaanee
Al-Manhaj E-Books 19 www.al-manhaj.com
'This day I have completed your Religion for you, and I have perfected My favor upon you, and
I am pleased with Islaam as a Religion for you.' [Surat-ul-Maa’idah: 3] So whatever was not (part
of) the Religion on that day, is not (part of) the Religion on this day. And the last part of this ummah
(nation) will not be rectified, except by that which rectified its first part."
This last sentence (from Imaam Maalik) is the main point with regard to presenting an answer to this
question. This is such that he said: "The last part of this ummah (nation) will not be rectified,
except by that which rectified its first part."
So just as the condition of the Arabs during the Days of Ignorance (Jaahiliyyah) was not rectified
except by the coming of their Prophet Muhammad, sallAllaahu 'alayhi wa sallam, with revelation from
the heavens – which aided them in this world and which will save them in the next – then the
foundation that the good Islaamic well-being must be set upon in this time, is nothing else but the
return to the Qur'aan and the Sunnah. In spite of this, this matter needs some elaboration, due to the
vast number of Islaamic groups and parties that exist in the field (of Da'wah) and which claim for
themselves to be upon the way by which Islaamic society and Muslim rule can be actualized.
We know from the Book of Allaah and the Sunnah of His Messenger, sallAllaahu 'alayhi wa sallam, that
the way towards actualizing this (goal) is only one – and it is that which Allaah has mentioned in His
saying:
"And this is My straight Path, so follow it. And do not follow the (other) paths for they will
separate you from His Path." [Surah Al-An’aam: 153] The Messenger of Allaah, sallAllaahu 'alayhi
wa sallam, explained this to his Companions. Thus, one day he, sallAllaahu 'alayhi wa sallam, drew a
straight line for them on the ground and then drew short lines on the sides of it. Then, while his,
sallAllaahu 'alayhi wa sallam,, noble finger moved up and down the straight line, he recited the aforementioned
ayah. Then he pointed to the lines that were drawn on the sides of the straight line.
Afterward, he said: "This is the Path of Allaah and these are the (other) paths. At the top of each
of these (other) ways, there is a devil calling towards it." 16
In another ayah, Allaah further supports what He stated in the previous ayah along with the Messenger
of Allaah's, sallAllaahu 'alayhi wa sallam, explanation for it in the afore-mentioned hadeeth. Thus He
says:
16 A saheeh hadeeth as was graded in Dhilaal-ul-Jannah fee Takhreej-is-Sunnah (16-17)
Fataawaa of Shaikh Al-Albaanee
Al-Manhaj E-Books 20 www.al-manhaj.com
"And whosoever opposes the Messenger after the guidance has been clearly explained to him,
and follows a way other than the Way of the Believers, We will turn him to what he has chosen
and land him in Hell – what an evil destination!" [Surah An-Nisaa: 115] In this ayah there is
profound and extensive wisdom, for Allaah, the Most Perfect, has connected the “Way of the
Believers” to what the Messenger, sallAllaahu 'alayhi wa sallam, came with. The Messenger,
sallAllaahu 'alayhi wa sallam, also indicated this point in the hadeeth about the splitting up of the
ummah into sects. So when he was asked concerning the saved sect, he, sallAllaahu 'alayhi wa sallam,
said: "That which (adheres to what) I and my companions are upon today." 17
So what then is the wisdom behind Allaah's mentioning of "the Way of Believers" in this ayah? And
what is the significance in the Messenger of Allaah's linking of his Companions to himself in the
previous hadeeth? The answer is: These noble companions were the ones who received the two
revelations (i.e. the Qur'aan and Sunnah) from the Messenger of Allaah, sallAllaahu 'alayhi wa sallam,
having that explained to them by him, sallAllaahu 'alayhi wa sallam, directly, without there being any
intermediary. But what is the condition of those that came after them? There is no doubt that the
matter is as the Messenger, sallAllaahu 'alayhi wa sallam, said: "Verily, the one who is present sees
what the one who is absent does not see." 18
This is why the Eemaan of the first Companions was much stronger then the Eemaan of those who
came after them. And this is what Allaah's Messenger, sallAllaahu 'alayhi wa sallam, alluded to in the
mutawaatir hadeeth: "The best of mankind is my generation, then those after them, then those
after them." 19 So based on this, a Muslim cannot depend solely on himself for obtaining the
understanding of the Qur'aan and the Sunnah. Rather he must seek help to understand the two of them
by returning back to the noble Companions, for they are the ones who received that from the Prophet,
sallAllaahu 'alayhi wa sallam, having it explained at times by his sayings, at other times by his actions,
and at other times by his silent approval.
Therefore, from the great necessities is that we must link 1) the call to the Qur'aan and Sunnah with 2)
Following the Way that the righteous predecessors (As-Salaf-us-Saalih ) were upon, acting upon what
has been stated previously in some ayaat and ahaadeeth. Such as when Allaah mentioned the "Way of
the Believers" and when the noble Prophet, sallAllaahu 'alayhi wa sallam, and his Companions
indicated that the understanding of the Qur'aan and the Sunnah is based upon what our first
predecessors (Salaf), from the Sahaabah and those who followed them in righteousness, were upon.
And here there occurs a very important question, which many of the Islaamic groups and parties have
17 See Silsilat-ul-Ahaadeeth As-Saheehah (no. 203)
18 See Saheeh Al-Jaami’ (no. 1641)
19 Saheeh Al-Bukhaaree
Fataawaa of Shaikh Al-Albaanee
Al-Manhaj E-Books 21 www.al-manhaj.com
neglected. Indeed it is: “What is the way towards gaining knowledge of what his, sallAllaahu 'alayhi
wa sallam, Companions were upon from the understanding and practical application of this Sunnah?”
The answer is: There is no way towards finding that out, except by returning to the science of Hadeeth,
the Science of Hadeeth Terminology, the Science of Al-Jarh wat-Ta'deel, and the application of it's
principles and its terms. This is such that the scholars are able to know what is authentically reported
on the Prophet, sallAllaahu 'alayhi wa sallam, from that which is not authentically reported on him,
sallAllaahu 'alayhi wa sallam. In order to conclude this answer, we say – in words that are more clear
– to the Muslims who strongly desire to return the glory, honor and rule back to Islaam, that you must
realize two things:
As for the first, then it is that you must incorporate and return into the minds of the Muslims, the
Religion of Islaam that is purified from all that has entered into it, which was not part of it on the day
when Allaah, the Mighty and Majestic, revealed His saying: "This day I have completed your
religion for you, and I have perfected My favor upon you and I am pleased with Islaam as a
Religion for you." [Surah Al-Maa’idah: 3] And returning to this matter, in this day – as it was during
the first times – requires intense and extreme efforts on the part of the Muslim scholars in the different
regions of the world.
The second thing is that: This persistent and serious work (to rectify the ummah) must be joined with
this purified knowledge. So the day that the Muslims return to the understanding of their Religion, as
the Companions of the Messenger of Allaah, sallAllaahu 'alayhi wa sallam, understood it, and they
then work hard to implement this pure Islaam, based on a knowledgeable and correct manner in every
aspect of life, then it is on that day that the Muslims will celebrate the victory of Allaah.
This is what I was able to say in this short time and I ask Allaah for us as well as for all the Muslims,
that He gives us the correct understanding of Islaam based in light of His Book, the authentic Sunnah
of His Messenger, sallAllaahu 'alayhi wa sallam, and that which our righteous predecessors (As-Salafus-
Saalih ) were upon. And we ask that He grants us the ability to act upon that. Verily He is the One
who hears and responds. [Al-Asaalah, Issue #11]
Question: Is that which in present days is known as a "military coup" against the ruler, mentioned
in the Religion or is it an innovation?
Answer: There is no basis for these actions in Islaam. And it is in opposition to the Islaamic
methodology with regard to establishing the da'wah (Call to Islaam) and creating the right atmosphere
for it. Rather, it is only an innovation introduced by the disbelievers, which has influenced some
Muslims. This is what I stated in my notes and explanation to Al-'Aqeedah At-Tahaawiyyah. [Al-
Asaalah, Issue #10]
Question: What is the correct opinion concerning Al-Hajaaj Ibn Yoosuf Ath-Thaqafee? Is he a
disbeliever?
Answer: We bear witness that Al-Hajaaj was an evildoer, an oppressor. However, we do not know
from him that he rejected any of those aspects from the Religion, which one is required to know by
Fataawaa of Shaikh Al-Albaanee
Al-Manhaj E-Books 22 www.al-manhaj.com
necessity. Therefore, it is not permissible to declare him a disbeliever just on the basis that he used to
commit evil, oppress others and kill innocent Muslims. [Al-Asaalah, Issue #1]
Question: To what degree is a Muslim to be concerned with politics today, within it's Islaamic
guidelines?
Answer: If what is intended by "politics" is the administering of the ummah, then the reality is that
politics is not from the acts of one individual from the people of the ummah, but rather, it is from the
duties of the Muslim State. This is if the objective behind politics, as we stated before, is the
administering of the ummah and the managing of its concerns in order to rectify what is in it from its
religious and worldly affairs. So if this is what is intended by "politics", then this is fard kifaayah (a
collective obligation). However, it is not for those people who are not in control of the state or of the
rule, nor for those who can neither produce benefit nor cause harm.
As for obtaining the news to be aware of the state of affairs and the weakness the Muslims are in, and
in order to avoid this outcome, then as we say, this is from the tasfiyah (purification) and the tarbiyah
(educating) – purifying Islaam from what has entered into it and focusing on educating the Muslims
and bringing them up on this purified Islam. So knowing these general circumstances, which
encompass the Muslims, is a must for the matter is as the old Arab poet has stated, taking his meaning
from an authentic hadeeth:
"I learned evil not for the sake of evil, but to avoid it
And whoever doesn't know good from evil, he will fall into it."
This is derived from a hadeeth – and I mean by it, the hadeeth of Hudhaifah Ibn Al-Yamaan,
radyAllaahu 'anhumaa, which is reported in the Saheehs of Al-Bukhaaree and Muslim. He,
radyAllaahu 'anhumaa, said: "The people used to ask Allaah's Messenger, sallAllaahu 'alayhi wa
sallam, about the good, but I used to ask him about the evil for fear of it reaching me." So being
aware of what the Muslims are upon from humiliation and weakness in order to turn them away from
that towards using the means of knowledge, strength and power, this is an obligation from the many
obligations.
As for engaging at length in obtaining news, knowledge of battles and western politics, then this is
from the aspect of: "Knowledge of something is better than being ignorant of it." This is something
that we do not forsake. However, at the same time, we must not be very enthusiastic and fanatical
about it. This is since the Prophet, sallAllaahu 'alayhi wa sallam, did not establish the affair of his
Companions on knowing and following precisely, the news of his enemies to the same extent as he,
sallAllaahu 'alayhi wa sallam, used to focus on teaching his Companions from one perspective and
cultivating them on Allaah's command from another perspective. This is our belief concerning politics
based on their two categories, which we have mentioned previously. [Al-Asaalah, Issue #18]
Question: Why use the name Salafee? Is it a call towards a party or a group or a madh-hab
(school of thought)? Or is it a new sect in Islaam?Fataawaa of Shaikh Al-Albaanee
Al-Manhaj E-Books 23 www.al-manhaj.com
Answer: Indeed, the word Salaf is well known in the Arabic language as well as in the religious
terminology. But what concerns us here, is its discussion from the religious standpoint. Thus, it has
authentically been reported on the Prophet, sallAllaahu 'alayhi wa sallam, that during the sickness from
which he died from, he said to Faatimah, radyAllaahu 'anhaa: "…So fear Allaah and have patience.
And I am the best Salaf (predecessor) for you." 20
Furthermore, the scholars have used this word “Salaf” many times, such that it would be too abundant
to number and take into account. Sufficient for us, is one example, and it was that which they have
used in their battle against innovations:
"And every good lies in following he who has preceded (man salaf)
while every evil lies in the innovating of he who came after (man khalaf)."
However, there are from those who claim to have knowledge, some people who reject this ascription,
claiming that there is no basis for it! And so they say: "It is not permissible for a Muslim to say: 'I am
Salafee.'” So it is as if he is saying that it is not permissible for a Muslim to say: "I am following the
Salaf As-Saalih (the Pious Predecessors) in what they were upon from beliefs, worship and
methodology"! There is no doubt that such a rejection – if that is what he intended – necessitates that
one free himself from the correct Islaam, which the righteous predecessors were upon, at the head of
whom was the Prophet, sallAllaahu ' alayhi wa sallam. This is as is indicated in the mutawaatir hadeeth
found in the two Saheehs and other than them, that he, sallAllaahu 'alayhi wa sallam, said:
"The best of mankind is my generation, then those that come after them, then those that come
after them." So it is not permissible for a Muslim to absolve himself from this ascription to the
righteous predecessors, whereas, if he were to absolve himself from any other ascription, the scholars
would not be able to ascribe him with disbelief or sinfulness.
As for the one who rejects this name from himself, will you not see him ascribing himself to one of the
madh-habs?! Regardless of whether this madh-hab is related to 'Aqeedah (Creed) or Fiqh
(Jurisprudence)? So he is either Ash'aree or Matureedee. Or perhaps he is from the people of Hadeeth
or Hanafee, or Shaafi'ee or Maalikee or Hanbalee or whatever else enters into the title of "Ahl-us-
Sunnah wal-Jamaa'ah." But in spite of this, the one who ascribes himself to the Ash'aree madh-hab or
to one of the four madh-habs is in fact ascribing himself to individuals that are not infallible, without a
doubt, even if there were scholars among them who were correct (in their verdicts). I wish I knew –
why doesn't he reject the likes of these ascriptions to individuals who are not free from error?
But as for the one who ascribes himself to the Salaf As-Saalih (righteous predecessors), then he indeed
ascribes himself to infallibility ('ismah), in the general sense. The Prophet, sallAllaahu 'alayhi wa
sallam, has mentioned that one of the signs of the Saved Sect is that they will cling tightly onto what
the Messenger of Allaah, sallAllaahu 'alayhi wa sallam, was upon and what his Companions were
upon. So whosoever holds tightly onto them, then he is certainly upon the guidance from his Lord.
20 Saheeh Muslim: no. 2450
Fataawaa of Shaikh Al-Albaanee
Al-Manhaj E-Books 24 www.al-manhaj.com
And furthermore, it is an ascription that brings honor to the one that ascribes himself to it, and one that
facilitates for him the way of the Saved Sect. And these matters do not apply to anyone that ascribes
himself to any other ascription, since they are not free from one of two things. Either it is an
ascription to a specific individual that is not infallible or it is an ascription to a group of people who
follow the methodology of this individual who is not infallible. So there is no infallibility (in their
ascriptions) either way. On the opposite of this, there is the infallibility of the Companions of the
Prophet, sallAllaahu 'alayhi wa sallam, (as a whole). And it is that which we have been commanded to
hold tightly onto, from his Sunnah and the Sunnah of his Companions after him.
And we must persist and strongly emphasize that our understanding of Allaah's Book and the Sunnah
of His Messenger, sallAllaahu 'alayhi wa sallam, must be in accordance with the methodology of his,
sallAllaahu 'alayhi wa sallam, Companions. This is so that we can be upon infallibility, as opposed to
inclining away towards the right or the left, or deviating with an understanding that comes solely from
ourselves, of which there is not found in the Book of Allaah or the Sunnah of His Messenger,
sallAllaahu 'alayhi wa sallam, that which provides evidence for it.
Furthermore, why is it not sufficient for us to ascribe ourselves to (just) the Qur'aan and the Sunnah?
The reason goes back to two matters, the first of which is related to the religious texts , and the second
of which is due to the existence of numerous Islaamic groups .
With regard to the first reason, then we find in the religious texts, a command to obey something else
in connection with the Qur'aan and the Sunnah, as is found in Allaah's saying:
"O you who believe! Obey Allaah and obey the Messenger and those in authority amongst you."
So if there were someone in authority, who was given the oath of allegiance by the Muslims, it would
be obligatory to obey him just as it would be obligatory to obey the Qur'aan and the Sunnah. So even
if he or those around him commit errors, it would be obligatory to obey him in order to repel the harm
of differences of opinions. But this is with the well-known condition: "There is no obedience to a
creation (if it involves) disobeying the Creator." 21 And Allaah, may He be Exalted, says:
"And whosoever opposes the Messenger after the guidance has been clearly explained to him,
and follows a way other than the Way of the Believers, We will turn him to what he has chosen
and burn him in Hell – what an evil destination." [Surah An-Nisaa: 115]
21 See Silsilat-ul-Ahaadeeth As-Saheehah: no. 179
Fataawaa of Shaikh Al-Albaanee
Al-Manhaj E-Books 25 www.al-manhaj.com
Indeed, Allaah, Mighty and Sublime, is free and far removed from all imperfections and defects. And
there is no doubt or uncertainty that His mentioning of "the Way of the Believers" here, is only due
to an immense and comprehensive wisdom and benefit. So it indicates that there is an important
obligation – and it is that our following of the Book of Allaah and the Sunnah of His Messenger,
sallAllaahu 'alayhi wa sallam, must be in accordance with what the first Muslims were upon. And they
are the Companions of Allaah's Messenger, sallAllaahu 'alayhi wa sallam, then those who came after
them, then those who came after them. And this is what the da'wat-us-salafiyyah (The Salafee Call)
invites and calls to. And it is that which is its main priority in the foundation of its call and the
methodology of its educating process.
Indeed, the Salafee Call truly unites the ummah, while any other call only causes division to the
ummah. Allaah, Mighty and Sublime, says:
"O you who believe, fear Allaah, and be with the truthful." [Surah At-Tawbah: 119]
So anyone that distinguishes between the Book and the Sunnah on one side and the Salaf As-Saalih
(Righteous Predecessors) on the other side, then he can never be truthful.
As for with regard to the second reason, then the groups and parties of today do not direct at all
towards the following of “the Way of the Believers ”, which has been mentioned in the ayah. And
there are some ahaadeeth, which further confirm and support that ayah, such as the hadeeth of the
seventy-three sects. All of them will be in the Hellfire except one. The Messenger of Allaah,
sallAllaahu 'alayhi wa sallam, described them as: "The one which is upon the same thing that I and
my companions are upon today." 22
This hadeeth resembles that ayah which mentions the “Way of the Believers”. Also, there is the
hadeeth of Al-'Irbaad Ibn Saariyah, radyAllaahu 'anhu, in which he, sallAllaahu 'alayhi wa sallam, said:
"So stick to my Sunnah and the Sunnah of the rightly-guided Khaleefahs after me."23 So
therefore, there are two Sunnahs: The Sunnah of the Messenger, sallAllaahu 'alayhi wa sallam, and the
Sunnah of the righteous Khaleefahs.
So there is no doubt that we – who come in a later time – must return back to the Qur'aan, the Sunnah
and "the Way of the Believers." And it is not permissible for us to say: "We can understand the
Qur'aan and the Sunnah by themselves, without turning towards what the righteous predecessors were
upon." And there must be an ascription in this time that distinguishes and is detailed. So it is not
sufficient for us to say, "I am a Muslim" only! Or "My madh-hab is Islaam"! For every sect says that!
– the Raafidee, the Ibaadee, the Qadyianee, as well as other sectarians!! So what is it that
distinguishes you from them?
22 See Silsilat-ul-Ahaadeeth As-Saheehah (no. 203 & 1492)
23 See Irwaa-ul-Ghaleel (no. 2455)
Fataawaa of Shaikh Al-Albaanee
Al-Manhaj E-Books 26 www.al-manhaj.com
And if you were to say, "I am a Muslim who is upon the Qur'aan and the Sunnah", this would also not
be sufficient. This is because, the members of these sects – of the Ash'arees and the Matureedees and
the Hizbees – they all claim to follow these two sources also. So there is no doubt that the clear, plain,
distinctive and decisive classification is to say, "I am a Muslim who is upon the Qur'aan and the
Sunnah and upon the methodology of the Salaf As-Saalih (Pious Predecessors). And that can be said
in short by saying, "I am a Salafee." So based on this, indeed the truth which is unavoidable, is that it
is not enough to rely on the Qur'aan and the Sunnah without the methodology of the Salaf, for it
explains these two with regard to understanding and concept, knowledge and action, and da'wah
(calling) and Jihaad.
And we know that they (the Sahaabah), may Allaah be pleased with them, did not used to fanatically
cling onto one specific madh-hab or to one specific individual. So there was not found amongst them
he who was Bakree (a follower of Abu Bakr), or 'Umaree (a follower of 'Umar), or 'Uthmaanee (a
follower of 'Uthmaan) or 'Alawee (a follower of 'Alee). Rather, if it were more easy for one of them to
ask Abu Bakr or 'Umar or Abu Hurairah, he would ask any of them. This is because they believed that
it was not permissible to have total and unrestricted devotion in following, except to one individual.
Indeed, he was the Messenger of Allaah sallAllaahu 'alayhi wa sallam, the one who did not speak from
his own desire, rather it was only revelation revealed to him.
And if we were to submit to these criticizers, for the sake of argument, that we would name ourselves
"Muslims" only, without ascribing ourselves to the Salaf – in spite of it being an honorable and correct
ascription. Would they abandon classifying themselves with the names of their parties or their madhhabs
or their ways – based on the fact that they are not prescribed in the Religion nor are they correct?
"So this contrast between us is enough for you
And every container becomes wet due to what is in it."
And Allaah is the Guide to the Right Path. And He, free is He from all defects, is the One in whom
we seek assistance. [Al-Asaalah, Issue #9]
Question: Are there any differences between (1) the disputes that take place between Ahl-us-
Sunnah themselves and (2) the talk that is directed from a person of Ahl-us-Sunnah to an innovator?
And what are they?
Answer: There is no doubt that there are differences between the two at times and at other times there
aren't any. The area of distinction between what occurs amongst the Ahl-us-Sunnah themselves from
disputes and debates and between what occurs amongst Ahl-us-Sunnah on one side and the innovators
on the other side, is clear and evident. This is because the obligation is that when there occurs a
debate and refutation between the Ahl-us-Sunnah themselves, then it must be from the aspect of
Allaah’s saying:
Fataawaa of Shaikh Al-Albaanee
Al-Manhaj E-Books 27 www.al-manhaj.com
"By the time. Verily, mankind is truly at loss. Except those who believe and do righteous deeds
and enjoin one another towards the truth and enjoin one another towards patience." [Surah Al-
'Asr: 1-3] So any debate or dispute that occurs between the Ahl-us-Sunnah, then it must be based on
the likes of this part of the verse:
"And they enjoin one another towards the truth and they enjoin one another towards patience."
This is also how it must be when the Ahl-us-Sunnah debate from one side and those who oppose them
with regard to the Sunnah – and they are the innovators – debate from the other side. However, the
manners of conduct may differ between the Ahl-us-Sunnah versus themselves and between the Ahlus-
Sunnah versus the innovators. So what is obligatory when there occurs a dispute between the Ahlus-
Sunnah themselves, is that they take into account the saying of Allaah: "Merciful to one another"
[Surah Al-Fat'h: 29] when doing that. As for when there occurs a dispute between these Muslims from
Ahl-us-Sunnah and the people of innovation, then there may be some harshness and severity in the
manners of conduct, which is suitable for this innovation and goes well against their innovation. This
is one difference between Ahl-us-Sunnah versus themselves from one perspective and Ahl-us-Sunnah
when they are debating or refuting the innovators from another perspective.
However, we must consider something with regard to each side, by which we do not exalt one group
over another nor criticize one group over another, and it is that we do not violate the principle found in
Allaah's saying: "Call unto the Way of your Lord with wisdom."
So many times when a person of the Sunnah refutes another person of the Sunnah, the refutation does
not just require wisdom, but rather it requires what is more important than that, from what has been
stated in the likes of Allaah's saying:
"And do not let your hatred of a people cause you to be unjust. Be just! That is closer to
Taqwaa." [Surah Al-Maa'idah: 8]
But many times, there occurs vile manners when they are refuting one other. And unfortunately, this
has now become manifest recently in current times in such a way as we would love for it not to be
present within the Sunni community, which we call the Salafee community. This is what I was able to
say in response to this question. [Al-Asaalah, Issue #18}
Question: What is your view on the book Tafseer Al-Manaar of Sayyid Rasheed Ridaa?
Answer: The book Tafseer-ul-Manaar is a good tafseer (Qur'aanic Commentary), in the general sense,
and it deals with many of the problems the Muslims are facing today. It has sections of research on
sociological, political and historical issues that are not found in the books of Tafseer that are well
known from the past. Rather, these sections of research cannot even be found in the books of
contemporary authors. This is since Sayyid Rasheed Ridaa was a big scholar as well as a Muslim
politician. However, at the same time, the book contains some deviations from the Sunnah in many
places, such as the ahaadeeth of 'Eesaa, the Dajjaal and the Mahdee. Likewise, it has some fataawaa
Fataawaa of Shaikh Al-Albaanee
Al-Manhaj E-Books 28 www.al-manhaj.com
(legal rulings) of his that he issued in early years, which are in contradiction to the truth. However, he
excused himself from some of them afterwards. [Al-Asaalah, Issue #2]
Question: Do you hold that the basis of the concept of “collective work” today is an innovation
and haraam (forbidden), or does your criticism (of it) include (only) the errors made in its
implementation?
Answer: No, there are no grounds for condemning collective work, so long as it is not accompanied
by tahazzub (partisanship, i.e. to that group). Working collectively is comprised in numerous verses
of the Qur’aan:
“O you who believe, fear Allaah and be with the truthful.” [Surah Tawbah: 119]
“Nor do they urge one another in feeding the needy." [Surah Al-Fajr: 18] and:
“Help one another in goodness (birr) and fear of Allaah (taqwaa).” [Surah Al-Maa'idah: 2]
So this type of collective cooperation (mentioned in the above verse) cannot be forsaken in the general
sense, for Islaam is based on this type of cooperation. However, the phenomenon that has appeared in
present days, in which there is a deviation away from this goal of helping one another in goodness and
fearing of Allaah, is that much tahazzub (partisanship) and ta’assub (fanaticism) has mixed into it.
And this is to the point that it has become something tolerated and readily accepted by many of the
callers, such as piling up and amassing all in the name of partisanship. We know that Allaah, in many
Qur’aanic verses, has forbidden holding partisanship and fanaticism to a (specific) group or a party
that has its own specific agenda and methodology. And if this agenda and this methodology are not in
conformity with the Sunnah, from every aspect, the partisanship, in these days, becomes a sect, which
represents what the Prophet, sallAllaahu 'alayhi wa sallam, warned of in some ahaadeeth regarded as
his explanation and an elaboration of Allaah's saying:
"And be not from among the polytheists – from those who divided their Religion and became
sects – every group being pleased with what it has with it." [Surah Room: 31-32]
It is well known to every Muslims the vast amount of groups that are spread all over the Islaamic
world today. And that each group has its own agenda and methodology. And these groups are in
conflict with one another and hold hatred and enmity for one another. This is contrary to the objective
Fataawaa of Shaikh Al-Albaanee
Al-Manhaj E-Books 29 www.al-manhaj.com
of working and coming together in Islaam. Each group has its own methodology and its own leader.
And every group has its own followers. All of these groups do not come together with one another.
Without a doubt, this (understanding) is what is contained in the generality of the previous verse:
"And be not from among the polytheists – from those who divided their Religion and became
sects – every group being pleased with what it has with it." [Surah Aali 'Imraan: 31-32]
To summarize: Joining together and working together, in working for the Islaam that the Messenger,
sallAllaahu 'alayhi wa sallam, was upon, is an obligatory matter. No two people will disagree in this
regard, nor will two goats ram into one another over it, as it is commonly said. Rather, the foundation
of the Muslims will never be established nor will the (true) Islaamic society ever become a reality, nor
will the Islaamic state ever be founded, except with the likes of this collective effort and working
together. However, its condition is that it must not be done with fanaticism to one particular
individual or group apart from another. Rather, the fanaticism and enthusiasm should be for Allaah
with regard to what has been reported on Allaah and His Messenger, sallAllaahu 'alayhi wa sallam, and
it should be done upon the methodology of the Salaf As-Saalih (righteous predecessors). [Al-Asaalah,
Issue #18}
Question: Do you hold that the means (wasaa'il) for da’wah (call to Islaam) are tawqeefiyyah
(dependent upon revelation) just like the prayer, fasting and all the other acts of worship? Or do you
hold that da’wah is mainly an act of Ijtihaadiyyah worship (dependent upon ones own investigation
and deduction) based on the understanding of the textual evidences and religious benefits, which are
considered and called for by the means, such as having knowledge and commanding the good?
Answer: Yes. I believe that the means (for giving da'wah) vary from time and place. And this is
something that no Faqeeh or scholar of the Book and the Sunnah will dispute.
The means differ from time and place, however proceeding towards applying these means requires
knowledge of what the Prophet, sallAllaahu 'alayhi wa sallam, was upon from his guidance and
Sunnah. The general rule for this is that: It is not permissible to turn away from the means that the
Messenger, sallAllaahu 'alayhi wa sallam, has handed down to us with the excuse that "The times have
changed." So if there exists some type of means, by which that which the Prophet, sallAllaahu 'alayhi
wa sallam, was upon can be supported, such as the means we use today – such as tape-recording and
book printing and the easy means of distribution – in order to bring the knowledge to distant places,
then no one can forsake this.
However, we know that many callers to Islaam today have accepted some types of means that the
Divine Legislation has not prescribed. Rather, they are the means that the Divine Legislation has
ordered us to oppose! I think that the cause for the acceptance of these means on their part is due to
(their) ignorance of Islaam. And we don't need to give examples, but instead we say that most of the
times there cannot be found any scholars, knowledgeable of the Qur'aan and Sunnah, in these Islaamic
groups and parties that exist today. The majority of the people who run these groups are from the
enthusiastic youth who are zealous for Islaam, then from those who do not exert themselves to study
Islaam, by way of the Qur'aan and the Sunnah upon the methodology of the Salaf As-Saalih .
Fataawaa of Shaikh Al-Albaanee
Al-Manhaj E-Books 30 www.al-manhaj.com
Talk concerning this topic will only lengthen and prolong. So we will now give an example of a
dispute that broke out during the close of one Ramadaan between one state and another, such that
some states fasted 29 days, and the other land completed 30 days! So in some of the western lands,
such as America, there were some Islaamic Callers (i.e. people of Da'wah) who announced that their
method for confirming the crescent at the beginning and end of the month was based on astronomy.
Either they were ignorant of the truth or they disregarded it and pretended to be ignorant about it. And
as it is said: "The sweeter of the two is (still) bitter."
The Prophet, sallAllaahu 'alayhi wa sallam, said: "We are an illiterate nation. We do not record
nor do we estimate. A month is like this, like this and like this – [or he sallAllaahu 'alayhi wa
sallam gestured with his hands three time like this, and this and this, meaning thirty days]."
Then he, sallAllaahu 'alayhi wa sallam, said: "A month is like this, this and this [meaning twenty
nine days]."
And in some of the authentic narrations, he, sallAllaahu 'alayhi wa sallam, said: "And if it becomes
too cloudy, then complete the month as thirty days." In many of the lands in which the people give
rulings according to their own way, some astronomers confirm the crescent for Ramadaan by
astronomical estimations and calculations. And the Messenger, sallAllaahu 'alayhi wa sallam, has
nullified this type of means. Even if it is a means based on knowledge, then only a few people in
some lands are aware of this knowledge. Whereas the prescribed means that the Messenger,
sallAllaahu 'alayhi wa sallam, has made as a proof for the beginning of the new month or the
termination of the current month is the innate natural and human means of physical sighting. And it is
not the scientific sighting, which we are not able to share knowledge of to all people.
Based on this, it is not permissible to cast off this type of means, which Islaam has brought, by
claiming that times have advanced and changed. So it has become clear from by previous explanation
that it is not proper today to take a means that the Messenger, sallAllaahu 'alayhi wa sallam, was able
to take (during his time, but which he didn't). The discussion on this topic will prolong severely. Ibn
Taimiyyah has a very beneficial section in his book Iqtidaa As-Siraat-il-Mustaqeem Mukhaalafatu
Ashaab-il-Jaheem dealing with this matter. I will abridge what I can from the words of Ibn
Taimiyyah:
The means that are introduced in a time and a place are divided into two categories:
1. A means of which a need for using it existed during the time of Allaah's Messenger, sallAllaahu
'alayhi wa sallam, but he did not use it. So introducing it is an innovation.
2. A means of which there did not exist a need to use it during the time of Allaah's Messenger,
sallAllaahu 'alayhi wa sallam. He (rahimahullaah) said: "So it should be examined. If the need
for introducing this means and using it is to make the Muslims refrain and lessen in their
application of the rulings of the Religion, then it is not permissible to use them. And if this is not
the case, then it is permissible." And Allaah is the One who grants success. [Al-Asaalah, Issue
#18}
Fataawaa of Shaikh Al-Albaanee
Al-Manhaj E-Books 31 www.al-manhaj.com
Question: There is a book called Mi'raaj Ibn 'Abbaas. Is it correct to attribute it to Ibn 'Abbaas,
radyAllaahu 'anhumaa?
Answer: It is not correct to attribute this book to Ibn 'Abbaas, radyAllaahu 'anhumaa. I have spoken
about Mi'raaj Ibn 'Abbaas in my refutation of Doctor Al-Bootee, which is circulated under the title:
"Defending the Prophetic Hadeeth and Biography." [Issue No. 17]
Question: What do you say with regard to the two tafseer books Fath-ul-Bayaan and Tafseer Al-
Manaar?
Answer: The tafseer book "Al-Manaar" is more beneficial than Fath-ul-Bayaan. And it deals with
many of the problems the Muslims are facing today. It has sections of research on sociological,
political and historical issues that are not found in the books of Tafseer that are well known from the
past. Rather, they cannot even be found in the books of contemporary authors. This is because Sayyid
Rasheed Ridaa was a big scholar as well as an enlightened Muslim politician. However, at the same
time, the book contains some aversions from the Sunnah in many places, such as the reports of 'Eesaa,
the Dajjaal and the Mahdee. Likewise, it has some fataawaa (legal rulings) of his concerning wearing
European hats and clothes, which he issued in his early years, but from which he excused himself
(some time afterward). [Al-Asaalah, Issue #10]
Fataawaa of Shaikh Al-Albaanee
Al-Manhaj E-Books 32 www.al-manhaj.com
Read more!
